Fusion Innovation Strategy – How SPRIND Empowers Disruptive Energy Technologies

Speaker: Dr. Antonia Schmalz (Technical Managing Director, Pulsed Light Technologies GmbH / SPRIND)

 

Why Disruption, Not Optimization, Will Power Fusion

 

At binding.energy 2025, Dr. Antonia Schmalz delivered a compelling call to arms: Fusion won’t succeed through marginal gains. It needs bold bets, unconventional paths – and the strategic structures to support them.

As physicist, co-founder of Pulsed Light Technologies (PLT), and fusion lead at SPRIND – Germany’s Federal Agency for Disruptive Innovation – Schmalz is at the intersection of physics, entrepreneurship, and public capital.

“We fund what others won’t. Because fusion can’t afford to wait.”

→ 🎥 Watch the full keynote now←

What is SPRIND? Germany’s DARPA for Fusion

SPRIND operates under the Federal Ministries for Economy and Education. Unlike traditional grant systems, it applies “DARPA-like” logic:

  • Radical innovation only – no incrementalism

  • Funding from €1M–€50M equity, plus €15M+ grants

  • Milestone-based, risk-tolerant, agile

  • Mix of venture debt, equity, and public-private leverage

“We don’t wait for consensus. We build trajectories.”

SPRIND Funding Model (2023–2024)

Instrument Amount Comment
Grants up to €15M Non-dilutive early-stage
Equity / Venture Debt €1M–€50M Convertible, milestone-bound
Co-investment ratio Up to 70% With private capital (pari passu)

Pulsed Light Technologies (PLT): Enabling Laser Fusion

Founded in August 2023, PLT is a 100% SPRIND subsidiary dedicated to building laser infrastructure for fusion startups. It currently backs:

  • Marvel Fusion

  • Focused Energy

Both operate under the diode-pumped, ultra-short-pulse paradigm.

PLT’s R&D portfolio includes:

  • ns compression lasers

  • fs ignition lasers

  • fs high-contrast systems

Total committed funding: €90M (2023–2025)

Structural Challenges on the Way to Commercialization

Dr. Schmalz highlighted the fragile path from research to real-world fusion machines:

  • High complexity → difficult engineering scaling

  • Fragmented startups → overlapping needs, few shared standards

  • Unclear markets → uncertain revenue forecasts

  • Supply chain → laser diodes, optics, crystals, HTS tape all bottlenecked

 

Supply Chain Breakdown for Inertial Fusion

According to the Laser Inertial Fusion Energy Memorandum (BMBF):

Component Estimated Need per Power Plant
Large optics (≥200 mm) 7,000–10,000 units
Nonlinear crystals >1,000 (large aperture, high quality)
Laser diodes 1–10 million @1kW/bar
HTS conductor ~300,000 km

From DARPA to ITRS: Strategic Lessons from Semiconductors

Schmalz pointed to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) as a model for how fusion can succeed. The ITRS, built by global chip experts (1998–2015), created:

  • Standardized roadmaps

  • Industrial alignment on R&D and production

  • A common “target horizon” across countries

“Fusion must think like semiconductors: plan together, compete later.”

Germany’s Vision: Fusion Infrastructure at Scale

Efforts include:

  • Fusion2040: BMBF-funded national strategy

  • New €100M research fund in Bavaria

  •  Supply chain networking events

  • Education, regulation, funding across the board

 

A Coordinated Fusion Innovation Strategy

📌 What Europe’s Fusion Strategy Must Include

  • ✅ National & EU-wide fusion roadmap
  • ✅ Public-private partnership models (e.g. INFUSE, SPRIND)
  • ✅ Milestone-based funding like DOE & Culham
  • ✅ Supply chain acceleration (crystals, diodes, HTS)
  • ✅ Talent programs & fast-track licensing

Final Message: Fusion is Industrial Now

Dr. Schmalz closed with a warning – and an opportunity:

“Public labs are ready for prototypes. Private startups are building hardware. Now the systems must meet – through policy, funding, and strategy.”

→ Reserve your seat at binding.energy ←